home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=93TT1515>
- <link 93TO0107>
- <title>
- Apr. 26, 1993: Behind The Magic Of Jurassic Park
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1993
- Apr. 26, 1993 The Truth about Dinosaurs
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- SCIENCE, Page 49
- Behind The Magic Of Jurassic Park
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>A team of Hollywood techno-wizards set out to "bring 'em back
- alive"
- </p>
- <p>By RICHARD CORLISS--With reporting by Andrea Dorfman/New York
- and David S. Jackson/Bozeman
- </p>
- <p> All the books said dinosaurs had a poor sense of smell,
- but this one seemed to do just fine. Anyway, what did books
- know? Here was the real thing.
- </p>
- <p> Coming toward him.
- </p>
- <p>-- Michael Crichton, Jurassic Park
- </p>
- <p> At the boundary between science and science fiction--in
- that twilight area where the imaginative sleuthing of
- paleontology meets the storytelling craft of filmmaking--lies
- Jurassic Park. The technicians working with director Steven
- Spielberg on the film version of Michael Crichton's best seller
- spared no effort or expense to make the story's dinosaurs as
- accurate as current knowledge permitted. Dinosaur fans from
- youth, they cared about getting it right. But on a movie screen,
- footnotes are not allowed. "We were trying to be credible,"
- co-producer Kathleen Kennedy says. "But we were also making a
- movie."
- </p>
- <p> So they took a little artistic license. Velociraptor, as
- described in the literature and in Crichton's novel, was a
- creature no more than five or six feet tall. But because the
- speedy, ferocious raptors are the story's star villains, the
- Spielberg team decided to make them half again as large. The
- choice was scientifically defensible, since so few specimens had
- been found that generalizations were hard to come by. Anyway,
- what did books know? Then a surprising thing happened. In Utah,
- paleontologists found bones of a real raptor, and it was the
- size of the movie's beast. "We were cutting edge," says the
- film's chief modelmaker, Stan Winston, with a pathfinder's
- pride. "After we created it, they discovered it."
- </p>
- <p> On June 11, when the movie opens, audiences should
- discover that Jurassic Park has the most sophisticated dinosaurs
- a think tank of techno-wizards can produce and $65 million can
- buy. "There's no way a museum could afford what we did," says
- Winston. "We created the most accurate dinosaurs ever." Top
- paleontologists who consulted on the film agree. In most cases,
- says Colorado paleontologist Robert Bakker, "Spielberg made the
- aesthetic choice that real dinosaurs are more exciting than
- made-up dinosaurs."
- </p>
- <p> In Crichton's novel, eccentric zillionaire John Hammond
- funds a project to clone dinosaur DNA taken from bloodsucking
- insects that were trapped in ancient amber to "bring them back
- alive, so to speak." The experiment's success goads Hammond to
- exploit the made-from-concentrate behemoths for profit. He
- hatches the dinosaurs on a Central American island and builds
- a theme park around them. Before the scheduled opening, a few
- guests--including craggy paleontologist Alan Grant, lissome
- paleobotanist Ellie Sattler and Hammond's two young
- grandchildren--come to Jurassic Park for a sneak preview. Then
- things go spectacularly wrong. The novel's first half is a
- controlled tram trip through this high-tech zoo, the second half
- a terror-filled obstacle course strewn with dinosaurs amuck:
- swooping pterodactyls, dilophosaurs that spit venom, a famished
- tyrannosaurus and a Panzer division of velociraptors, the
- meanest and cagiest of the menagerie.
- </p>
- <p> The book and the movie, which stars Sam Neill and Laura
- Dern, are essentially theme-park rides--say, EPCOT Center's
- Universe of Energy, the one with the Audio-Animatronic dinosaurs--which Crichton has given a cunning tweak. The novel is also
- a dark musing on the hubris that can infect science and
- capitalism in the heady, dicey enterprise of cloning DNA. The
- biotechnologist thinks he is God; the businessman dreams he is
- Croesus.
- </p>
- <p> Spielberg may have designs on both roles: he made the
- movie, and even donated $25,000 to the Dinosaur Society. (In
- return the society renamed the oldest known ankylosaur
- "Jurassosaurus nedegoapeferkimorum"; part of the second word is
- an acronym of the surnames of the film's cast.) Now he is
- marketing it. His outfit, Amblin Entertainment, and Universal
- Pictures, the film's distributor, have signed deals with more
- than 100 companies (including Kenner, Sega and Milton Bradley)
- to peddle more than 1,000 Jurassic Park products, from action
- figures and video games to calendars and candy. If your kids
- aren't dino-maniacs now, they will be, Spielberg hopes, by the
- time school's out.
- </p>
- <p> Curators of natural history museums hope so too. They have
- long recognized that dinosaur watching is prime infotainment,
- and they are ready to exploit the want-see for Jurassic Park
- with ambitious exhibitions tied to the film in New York,
- Philadelphia, Washington, New Haven and other cities. Last month
- an educational poster on dinosaurs, produced by New York's
- American Museum of Natural History, was mailed free to 7 million
- schoolchildren, courtesy of McDonald's--which will also be
- handing out Jurassic Park mugs at the local franchises.
- </p>
- <p> But $100 million worth of marketing won't bring the movie,
- or the creatures, to life. That is the responsibility of the
- swamis of special effects--the puppeteers, modelmakers and
- computer mavens--working closely with enthusiastic experts.
- Phil Tippett, an animator and longtime dinosaur buff, would
- whisper admonitions after nearly every take: "The head would
- never move like that," or "The claw wouldn't extend that far."
- He was the chief enforcer of Spielberg's dictum: that the
- dinosaurs be animals, not monsters.
- </p>
- <p> Also on hand was Jack Horner, curator of paleontology at
- Montana State University's Museum of the Rockies and Crichton's
- model for the book's hero--though Horner wryly notes that Alan
- Grant is "better funded." He advised on every creature feature,
- from head (they often lost teeth) to foot (when they walked,
- the heel, not the toe, hit the ground first.) "They have detail
- inside the T. rex's mouth that no one has ever seen. It's a
- guess--a best guess. And a lot of adults will be surprised
- that dinosaurs don't drag their tails," Horner says. "But the
- kids will know it's right."
- </p>
- <p> This eminent dino digger was as awestruck as any
- Barney-balmy child when he saw modelmaker Winston's 9,000-lb.
- 40-ft.-long Tyrannosaurus rex model. "It was the closest I've
- ever been to a live dinosaur," he avers. He was standing a few
- feet from the resting T. rex when its head jerked up with
- startling speed and swung back and forth, alert and lifelike.
- "It came up real fast, its eyes dilated, its skin was twitching.
- When you see it, it doesn't take much imagination to get beyond
- the fantasy. I jumped about 10 feet backward!"
- </p>
- <p> But the model T. was a dinosaur in another sense; it may
- represent a vanishing craft. "A model can never be a full,
- performing creature," says Mark Dippe, a visual-effects
- supervisor at Industrial Light & Magic. "But computer-generated
- creatures can run, hop, do anything." To bone up on dinosaurs,
- Dippe and his colleagues studied the movements of live
- elephants, rhinos and giraffes and watched footage of alligators
- tearing meat apart. Ace animator Steve Williams even kept an
- iguana in his office--for research, not company.
- </p>
- <p> ILM created its dinosaurs inside out: a simplified
- skeleton, then skin covering, then coloration, then the fine
- tuning with wrinkles, scales, dirt. "You see skin moving over
- bones and over muscles," says ILM's Dennis Muren, who directed
- the project. "When the brachiosaurus walks, the weight of its
- chest makes it swing back and forth." Dippe believes the process
- is so adroit that, "if we had real dinosaurs, we'd probably
- still do it this way. Our animals don't get tired or hungry."
- </p>
- <p> Audiences will be the judge of whether Jurassic Park lives
- up to its makers' hopes and boasts. They will be looking not
- for a museum exhibit but for a good movie--one that spurs
- childlike terror and wonder by fooling the eye 24 times a
- second. They want to be convinced that the artful fraud on the
- screen is real. The prehistoric creatures from The Lost World
- (1925), One Million B.C. (1940), The Beast from 20,000 Fathoms
- (1953) and Godzilla (1954) dwelt in kids' nightmares, not
- because they were realistic--scientists knew so much less
- about dinosaurs back then, and film budgets were so much smaller--but because they were persuasive.
- </p>
- <p> The folks at Jurassic Park are banking that all their
- expertise will evoke those age-old giggles and screams--that
- scientific fact will be alchemized into sublime fakery.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-